Controversy Surrounding Spending

Advocacy Versus Criticism

According to Mail Online, taxpayer-funded ‘guaranteed income’ programs, offering struggling families up to $36,000 with no conditions, are expanding across the US totaling over $125 million. These initiatives gained traction during the pandemic with progressive leaders advocating for cash support for those below the poverty line. However, criticism arose when a mother-of-three in Washington DC used over half of her $10,800 lump sum on a luxury holiday to Miami along with new clothes for her children and a personal makeover.

Canethia Miller, 27, made headlines after spending $6,000 of her lump sum from a guaranteed income program on a luxury vacation for her family along with other expenses like clothing and a haircut. Similar programs across cities like Los Angeles and New York offer monthly payments ranging from $500 to $1,000 for up to three years with no strings attached. Eligibility criteria are typically based on the federal poverty level allowing individuals or families earning below certain thresholds to qualify.

Advocates argue that guaranteed income initiatives can lift people out of poverty by promoting financial stability and facilitating goals such as moving out of subsidized housing. Recipients have reported positive impacts including escaping homelessness. However, critics contend that these programs undermine societal norms and may incentivize irresponsible spending as seen in cases like Miller’s.

Nationwide ongoing projects are set to distribute over $125 million to nearly 10,000 Americans across more than 30 programs. While some data sources like Stanford University’s Basic Income Lab track numerous initiatives, others remain unaccounted for like the Washington DC scheme costing around $1.5 million. Most of these programs rely on taxpayer funding.

READ ALSO: $600,000 Settlement Payment: Las Vegas Police Panel Approves Review Journal

Evaluation and Impact of Guaranteed Income Programs

The largest guaranteed income scheme, the Big Leap program in Los Angeles allocates $36 million to provide $1,000 per month for one year to 3,200 participants. Similar projects in Los Angeles County and New York City also receive significant taxpayer funds aiming to assess the impact of unconditional income on recipients randomly selected from eligible applicants.

Washington DC’s guaranteed income project administered by Martha’s Table through its Strong Families, Strong Futures initiative, received an additional $1 million commitment from Mayor Muriel Bowser’s office for a second year. Canethia Miller, a participant, chose a $10,800 lump sum over 12 monthly payments of $900. She spent $6,000 on a Miami vacation showcasing the city’s wealth to her children and used the rest for bills, a car, and opening a bank account. The initiative also offers optional financial literacy courses.

Participants in guaranteed income programs emphasize the importance of financial literacy with some suggesting that such courses should be mandatory. LA County’s BREATHE program, providing $1,000 per month for three years has shared success stories from participants. While many programs target mothers and young families, critics argue that cash handouts fail to address the root causes of poverty.

READ ALSO: Paterson’s Guaranteed Income Program: A Lifeline For Struggling Families!