In the lead-up to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, a series of events and geopolitical maneuvers between NATO and Russia have come under scrutiny. The article sheds light on critical developments that may have played a role in escalating tensions in the region.

The piece reveals Russia’s long-standing opposition to NATO’s eastward expansion, dating back to the 1990s. Key moments include Boris Yeltsin’s warning to then-President Bill Clinton in 1997 and Russia’s displeasure with NATO’s expansion near its borders. The failure to implement the Minsk II agreement by Ukraine further strained relations.

Military Maneuvers and Agreements: The article details lesser-known military activities, such as Ukraine’s use of Turkish combat drones and annual military exercises with the U.S. in western Ukraine. It questions how the West would react if Russia engaged in similar activities near its borders.

Ukraine’s Preparations for War: The author highlights Ukraine’s strategic measures, including President Zelensky’s 2022 decree for the de-occupation of Crimea and the signing of a military cooperation treaty with the U.S. in 2021. This prompts speculation on whether Ukraine, with U.S. support, was preparing for conflict.

NATO’s Aggressive Moves: The article emphasizes NATO’s actions, including its expansion to Russia’s borders in 1999 and 2004, the U.S. withdrawal from arms reduction treaties, and NATO’s stationing of troops near Russia. These moves are seen as threats to Russia’s security.

Russian Proposals for Security Guarantees: The core of the article explores Russia’s attempts to establish legally binding security guarantees with NATO and the U.S. The proposals, sent in December 2021, encompassed issues such as mutual non-aggression, withdrawal of forces, and refraining from provocative military activities.

NATO’s Response: The crux of the matter lies in NATO’s response during a digital conference on January 7, 2022. The alliance chose not to negotiate the core issues raised by Russia, leaving tensions unresolved. Secretary General Stoltenberg reiterated support for Ukraine and Georgia, while asserting every country’s right to choose its alliances.

Escalation to Conflict: Six weeks after NATO’s non-negotiation stance, Russia launched its military intervention into Ukraine. The article suggests that the failure to engage in meaningful dialogue based on Russia’s security concerns may have contributed to the subsequent conflict.

The piece concludes by questioning whether NATO and the U.S. missed an opportunity to prevent the war by dismissing Russia’s security proposals outright. It highlights the importance of diplomatic dialogue and negotiation in averting conflicts and ensuring the security of all nations involved.